Answer: the answer is : you write a compound inequality for the amount of money she would spend, subtract the money she did spend and divide by the cost of what she has yet to buy she can buy between 1-7 shirt
Step-by-step explanation:
I took quiz
Answer:
the first one, QPN and OPS
Explanation:
they're intersecting and opposites
hope that helped :)
Answer:
D.)
Step-by-step explanation:
The zero's are referencing when y=0, note that when y=0 they are talking about the x-intercepts. You can graph the function and see when the graph crosses the x-axis or solve for the x-values. I will solve it via factoring and so:

Multiply the outer coefficients, in this case 1 and 6, and 1×6=6. Now let's think about all the factors of 6 we have: 6×1 and 2×3. Now is there a way that if we use any of these factors and add/subtract them they will return the middle term 5? Actually we can say 6-1=5 and 2+3=5. Let's try both.
First let's use 6 and -1 and so:

Notice how we have (x+6) and (x-6), these factors do not match so this is incorrect.
Now let's try 2 and 3 and so:

Notice how the factors (x+3) matched up so this is a factor and so is (x+2), now to solve for the zero's let's make f(x)=0 and solve each factor separately:
Case 1:

Case 2:

So your zero's are when x=-2 and x=-3.
D.) x=-3 and x=-2 because the graph crosses the x-axis at -3 and -2.
~~~Brainliest Appreciated~~~
Answer:
Hexagon
Step-by-step explanation:
180°(n-2)
180°(6sides-2)
180°(4)
720°
In box 1, the reason that justifies the statement, m∠BAD = m∠BAC + m∠CAD, is: angle addition postulate.
<h3>What is the Angle Addition Postulate?</h3>
The angle addition postulate states that the measure of a larger angle equals the sum of smaller angles that make up the larger angle.
∠BAD comprises of ∠BAC and ∠CAD.
Therefore, based on the angle addition postulate, m∠BAD = m∠BAC + m∠CAD.
The missing reason in box 1 would be: angle addition postulate.
Learn more about angle addition postulate on:
brainly.com/question/24782727
#SPJ5