Answer:
A financial system functions as an intermediary and facilitates the flow of funds from the areas of surplus to the areas of deficit. It is a composition of various institutions, markets, regulations and laws, practices, money managers, analysts, transactions, and claims & liabilities.May 29, 2016
(can u flag me)
Answer:
in the past we did not have much reshcearch to help figure out what is wrong
now we have the tech to help and we also have vacanation
Explanation:
Answer:
$11.59 million
Explanation:
The computation of earning before interest and tax is shown below:-
Free cash flow = Operating cash flow - Investment in operating cash flow
$8.17 million = Operating cash flow - $2.17 million
Operating cash flow = $10.34 million
For calculating the earning before interest
Operating cash flow = Earning before interest - Taxes + Depreciation
$10.34 million = Earning before interest - $2.17 million + $0.92 million
= $10.34 million = Earning before interest - $1.25 million
Earning before interest = $11.59 million
Answer:
competitor-oriented pricing
Explanation:
competitor-oriented pricing is a technique for valuing in which a producer's value is resolved more by the cost of a comparable item sold by an incredible contender than by contemplation of purchaser request and cost of generation; likewise alluded to as Competition-Based Pricing.
For instance: a firm needs to value another espresso producer. The company's rivals sell it at $25, and the organization thinks about that the best cost for the new espresso producer is $25. It chooses to set this very cost without anyone else item.
Answer:
<em>Most definitely, Tony would lose due to the integration clause.</em>
Explanation:
An integration clause <em>requires a short paragraph to be inserted into a written contract to confirm a final deal between two sides.</em>
Since drafting a written contract, it may fail to be fully checked by one of the parties involved to ensure that all provisions are included and that both parties sign the contract, which Tony failed to consider.
If this happens, one party could contend that the other failed to uphold a particular condition or phrase that they consented to verbally.
