Answer:
well if its for self defense or for the stand your ground law
Explanation:
Answer:
B: keeping foo safe
Explanation:
I guess i don't <em>need</em> an explanation, right?
Answer:
Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.
Explanation:
Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.
This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.
King John demanded soldiers or money from his barons in order to carry on a war in France over disputed lands. Many of the barons believed that the dispute between John and the French king was none of their business. So, they refused to send King John knights or pay what amounted to a special tax.
BRAINLIEST PLEASE
Answer:
In the case of Parsons v. State, 1887, the Irresistible Impulse Test was first introduced.
Explanation:
The Court of Alabama stated that, although it would have been possible that the defendant had right from wrong, that he had "dismissed the power of choice between right and wrong" and that, "at a time when his free organization was destroyed," and that therefore, the alleged crime was so closely related, in relation to cause and effect, to such a mental disease that it has been the result of.
I hope this was understood very well, and as always, I am joyous to assist anyone at any time. ☺️
