Answer:
is the fact that the people in this group believe that their behavior is the result of external factors, for instance luck.
Explanation:
Unassuming bias may be defined as the tendency to explain that people's success depends on external factors (such as luck, help received from other people, a certain situation, etc.), and that people's mistakes or failures are the result of their own personal weaknesses.
For the answer to the questions above, I think the most significant thing is probably manpower. The Romans had the pool of hundreds of thousands of small farmers to draw upon. The Carthaginians used mainly mercenaries and federate.<span>The Roman Govt also seems to have taken the war more seriously, as a 'total war', and mobilized all their resources earlier and more effectively. Combined with their larger manpower this meant they were able to absorb defeats more easily and continue fighting. I have read a book which used the analogy of a disciplined roman 'communist' society fighting a disinterested Carthaginian 'capitalist' society. Romans have a strong government system which is so organized and amazing how they developed that advance system that time
</span>I hope my answer helped you.
I really wish you provided the research study. I would be happy to answer. It should be attached to wherever you found this question. Hope this helps :)