Answer:
The claim made by the researcher lacks the validity on basis of reasons as indicated in the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim made by the researcher is not valid on basis of following reasons:
- Interacting variables are not mapped accurately. The additional variables as the health status of the volunteers, eating and fitness habits are not considered in the consideration. This results in a in complete validation.
- The placebo effect is not catered accordingly. As the half of the volunteers are taking nothing, this is not the direct influence of the placebo and thus double-blinded testing for placebo effect is to be ensured in future experiments.
- The environmental effects are not considered as the effect under study is dependent on the environmental effects, thus the claim is biased and the generalization is not valid.
Answer:
$27.30
Step-by-step explanation:
$4.80×5=$24.00+$3.30=$27.30
Answer:
Are you asking just the next two integers are? If so, they're 135 and 136
Answer:
C, or 18.0
Step-by-step explanation:
The SAS theorem provides that the area is 17.97, which rounds up to 18.0, giving you C as the answer. The other two are far too high for the given values.
