Answer:
$0.30
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide 4.50 by 15.
Using the ASA congruence theorem, the missing statement in her proof is: A. ΔACD ≅ ΔECB.
<h3>What is the ASA Congruence Theorem?</h3>
Two triangles are congruent by the ASA congruence theorem if they have two pairs of corresponding congruent angles and a pair of included congruent sides.
In the proof given in the diagram, using the ASA congruence theorem, Rowena has been able to prove that ΔACD and ΔECB have two pairs of corresponding congruent angles and a pair of included congruent sides.
Therefore, the missing statement in her proof is: A. ΔACD ≅ ΔECB.
Learn more about the ASA congruence theorem on:
brainly.com/question/2102943
#SPJ1
100% is always the full number so 113 is your answer
Hope this helps and have a blessed day
The answer is B) <span>(60 - 4x)(50 + 2x) = 2,800
The revenue without any change in price is:
$60/student x 50 students = 3,000
Every price drop reduces the price/student by four, so the first term, which describes the fee per student, is 60 - 4x
Every price drop also increases the number of students by two, so the second term, which describes the number of students, is 50 + 2x</span>
Answer:
Verified!
Step-by-step explanation:
Upper or lower triangular matrix does not make any difference in finding eigenvalues because equalizing determinant to zero will lead to the same result.
Let's apply it for 2x2 matix:
![A = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}a&0\\b&c\end{array}\right]\\\\\lambda I - A = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}\lambda&0\\0&\lambda\end{array}\right]-\left[\begin{array}{ccc}a&0\\b&c\end{array}\right]\\\\det(\lambda I - A) = det\left[\begin{array}{ccc}\lambda-a&0\\-b&\lambda-c\end{array}\right]=(\lambda-a)(\lambda-c)=0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Da%260%5C%5Cb%26c%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Clambda%20I%20-%20A%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%5Clambda%260%5C%5C0%26%5Clambda%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D-%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Da%260%5C%5Cb%26c%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%5C%5C%5C%5Cdet%28%5Clambda%20I%20-%20A%29%20%3D%20det%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%5Clambda-a%260%5C%5C-b%26%5Clambda-c%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%3D%28%5Clambda-a%29%28%5Clambda-c%29%3D0)
So, eigenvalues are entries on the diagonal because zeros in upper side or lower side vanishes the remaining part and only we have
.
So, eigenvalues are 
Let's apply it for 3x3 matrix:
![A = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}a&0&0\\b&c&0\\d&e&f\end{array}\right]\\\\\lambda I - A = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}\lambda&0&0\\0&\lambda&0\\0&0&\lambda\end{array}\right]-\left[\begin{array}{ccc}a&0&0\\b&c&0\\d&e&f\end{array}\right]\\\\det(\lambda I - A) = det\left[\begin{array}{ccc}\lambda-a&0&0\\-b&\lambda-c&0\\-d&-e&\lambda-f\end{array}\right]=(\lambda-a)(\lambda-c)(\lambda-f)=0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Da%260%260%5C%5Cb%26c%260%5C%5Cd%26e%26f%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Clambda%20I%20-%20A%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%5Clambda%260%260%5C%5C0%26%5Clambda%260%5C%5C0%260%26%5Clambda%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D-%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Da%260%260%5C%5Cb%26c%260%5C%5Cd%26e%26f%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%5C%5C%5C%5Cdet%28%5Clambda%20I%20-%20A%29%20%3D%20det%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7D%5Clambda-a%260%260%5C%5C-b%26%5Clambda-c%260%5C%5C-d%26-e%26%5Clambda-f%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D%3D%28%5Clambda-a%29%28%5Clambda-c%29%28%5Clambda-f%29%3D0)
So as above, eigenvalues are entries on the diagonal because zeros in upper side or lower side vanishes the remaining part and only we have
.
So eigenvalues are 