<span>1. </span>People
in that country can do whatever they want because they are free to do so.
<span>2. </span>The
result is lack of discipline and the government will not do anything about it,
<span>3. </span><span>The
people has the power to chose who will govern the country and this situation can
be manipulated by offering money especially in underprivileged areas.</span>
1. The Northern Colonies had warm summers and very cold winters with and a thin layer of soil only for subsistence farming. The Southern Colonies had hot summers and cold winters and had rich fertile soil suitable for cash crop farming
2. The Stono rebellion is significant because it established resentment against British domination and increased tension between colonists and the British
An emergency fund is a financial safety net for future mishaps and/or unexpected expenses. Financial planners recommend that emergency funds should typically have three to six months' worth of expenses in the form of highly liquid assets. Savers can use tax refunds and other windfalls to build up their fund.
<span>The process of natural selection produces an emotional feeling as opposed to a rational judgment. Natural selection, representing the sense of justice, was exemplified by Darwin in opposition to Rawls' Theory of Justice, both representing opposing ideas regarding the resolution of conflicts</span>
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
