<h2>
Hello!</h2>
The answer is:
The empirical formula is the option B. 
<h2>
Why?</h2>
The empirical formula of a compound is the simplest formula that can be written. On the opposite, the molecular formula involves a variant of the same compound, but it can be also simplified to an empirical formula.

We are looking for a formula that cannot be simplified by dividing the number of molecules/atoms that conforms the compound.
Let's discard option by option in order to find which formula is an empirical formula (cannot be simplified)
A. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

B. 
It's an empirical formula since it cannot be obtained by the multiplication of a whole number and the simplest formula. It's the simplest formula that we can find of the compound.
C. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

D. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

Hence, the empirical formula is the option B. 
Have a nice day!
Answer:
339kJ
Explanation:
Given parameters:
Mass of steam = 150g = 0.15kg
Initial temperature of steam = 100°C
Final temperature of water = 100°C
Unknown:
Quantity of heat that must be removed to condense the steam = ?
Solution:
The heat involved here is a latent heat because there is no change temperature. The process is just a phase change.
H = mL
m is the mass
L is the latent heat of vaporization = 2,260 kJ/kg
Insert the parameters and solve;
H = 0.15kg x 2,260 kJ/kg
H = 339kJ
The theory assumes that collisions between gas molecules and the walls of a container are perfectly elastic, gas particles do not have any volume, and there are no repulsive or attractive forces between molecules .