To figure this out i would just dived 2.8 by 3 then multiply by two. I do not know if you must keep it as a fraction but this is the easiest way for me to do it
Answer:
120
Step-by-step explanation:
based on the plot the closest number to the patter seem to be around 100 but its not 90 as 90 would be below so it has to be about 12
Answer:
Yes, La Tasha is correct, because the correlation coefficient is r=0
Step-by-step explanation:
Please, see the attached file.
Thanks.