

- <u>We </u><u>have </u><u>given </u><u>two </u><u>linear </u><u>equations </u><u>that</u><u> </u><u>is </u><u>2x </u><u>-</u><u> </u><u>3y </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u>6</u><u> </u><u>and </u><u>x</u><u> </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>3y </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>1</u><u>2</u><u> </u><u>.</u>

- <u>We </u><u>have </u><u>to </u><u>find </u><u>the </u><u>value </u><u>of </u><u>x </u><u>and </u><u>y </u><u>by </u><u>elimination </u><u>method</u><u>. </u>



<u>Multiply </u><u>eq(</u><u> </u><u>2</u><u> </u><u>)</u><u> </u><u>by </u><u>2</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>-</u>


<u>Subtract </u><u>eq(</u><u>1</u><u>)</u><u> </u><u>from </u><u>eq(</u><u>2</u><u>)</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>-</u>





<u>Now</u><u>, </u><u> </u><u>Subsitute</u><u> </u><u>the </u><u>value </u><u>of </u><u>y </u><u>in </u><u>eq(</u><u> </u><u>1</u><u> </u><u>)</u><u>:</u><u>-</u>





Hence, The value of x and y is 2 and 10/3
Answer: The road, crucifix/cross, sidewalks, railroads, and so much more.
Step-by-step explanation: Roads are parallel so that everyone can get to the same place in different lanes. This is important because lines that aren't parallel will inevitably meet, meaning that a highway would eventually merge its two lanes. This happens, but most of the highway is parallel. The same is true of sidewalks and railroads. The crucifix/cross is a Christian symbol, and while I'm not Christian, I'm sure it's important to a lot of people who are.
Answer:
Marie ran at a faster rate. It takes 27 minutes for Lisa to run 15 laps while it takes Marie 26.25 minutes to run 15 laps.
Step-by-step explanation:
18 ÷ 10 = 1.8 (Lisa's rate)
14 ÷ 8 = 1.75 (Marie's rate)
1.8 x 15 = 27 minutes (How long it takes for Lisa to run 15 laps)
1.75 x 15 = 26.25 (How long it takes for Marie to run 15 laps)
I'm assuming you're talking about the indefinite integral

and that your question is whether the substitution

would work. Well, let's check it out:



which essentially brings us to back to where we started. (The substitution only served to remove the scale factor in the exponent.)
What if we tried

next? Then

, giving

Next you may be tempted to try to integrate this by parts, but that will get you nowhere.
So how to deal with this integral? The answer lies in what's called the "error function" defined as

By the fundamental theorem of calculus, taking the derivative of both sides yields

and so the antiderivative would be

The takeaway here is that a new function (i.e. not some combination of simpler functions like regular exponential, logarithmic, periodic, or polynomial functions) is needed to capture the antiderivative.