Explain why smoke particles in air move about faster if the temp of the air is increased??

Is space expanding within clusters of galaxies? why or why not?

GarryVolchara [31]

No, since their gravity is powerful enough to keep them together even while the universe expands as a whole. Space is not expanding within clusters of galaxies.

<h3>What is a galaxy?</h3>

A galaxy is a massive clump of gas, dust, and billions of stars and their solar systems bound together by gravity.

No, since their gravity is powerful enough to keep them together even while the universe expands as an entire.

Hence,space is not expanding within clusters of galaxies.

To learn more about the galaxy, refer to the link;

brainly.com/question/2905713

#SPJ1

6 0

2 years ago

A 70.0-kg person throws a 0.0420-kg snowball forward with a ground speed of 35.0 m/s. A second person, with a mass of 57.0 kg, c

ollegr [7]

Answer:

so throwers new velocity = 2.18032m/s

so catchers new velocity = 0.02577m/s

Explanation:

Directly by conservation of momentum we can write

$m_1u_1+m_2u_2= m_1v_1+m_2v_2$

let x be the thrower's new velocity

(70+0.042)×2.2 + 57×0 = 70× x +0.042×35 +57×0

x = 2.18032m/s

so the velocity of 70 kg man = 2.18032m/s

so throwers new velocity = 2.18032m/s

now again by conservation of momentum

0.042×35 = (57+0.042) ×y

y = 0.02577m/s

so catchers new velocity = 0.02577m/s

3 0

3 years ago

A 0.500-kg mass suspended from a spring oscillates with a period of 1.18 s. How much mass must be added to the object to change

olga55 [171]

Answer:

The add mass = 5.465 kg

Explanation:

Note: Since the spring is the same, the length and Tension are constant.

f ∝ √(1/m)........................ Equation 1 (length and Tension are constant.)

Where f = frequency, m = mass of the spring.

But f = 1/T ..................... Equation 2

Substituting Equation 2 into equation 1.

1/T ∝ √(1/m)

Therefore,

T ∝ √(m)

Therefore,

T₁/√m₁ = k

where k = Constant of proportionality.

T₁/√m₁ = T₂/√m₂ ........................ Equation 3

making m₂ the subject of the equation

m₂ = T₂²(m₁)/T₁²........................... Equation 4

Where T₁ = initial, m₁ = initial mass, T₂ = final period, m₂ = final mass.

Given: T₁ = 1.18 s m₁ = 0.50 kg, T₂ = 2.07 s.

Substituting into equation 4

m₂ = (2.07)²(0.5)/(1.18)²

m₂ = 4.285(1.392)

m₂ = 5.965 kg.

Added mass = m₂ - m₁

Added mass = 5.965 - 0.5

Added mass = 5.465 kg.

Thus the add mass = 5.465 kg

7 0

3 years ago

An object floats in water with 5 8 of its volume submerged. The ratio of the density of the object to that of water is

ki77a [65]

Answer:

$\dfrac{5}{8}$

Explanation:

m = Mass of object = $\rho v$

m' = Mass of water = $\rho' v'$

$\rho$ = Density of object

$\rho'$ = Density of water

Weight of the water displaced is the force in the case of floating objects

According to the question

$v'=\dfrac{5}{8}v$

In the case of floating objects

$W=W'\\\Rightarrow mg=m'g\\\Rightarrow \rho vg=\rho'v'g\\\Rightarrow \rho v=\rho' \dfrac{5}{8}vg\\\Rightarrow \rho=\rho' \dfrac{5}{8}\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{\rho}{\rho'}=\dfrac{5}{8}$

The ratio of the density of the object to that of water is $\dfrac{5}{8}$

3 0

4 years ago

Explain at least two differences between justice system laws and scientific laws.

bezimeni [28]

The adversarial system is rigid – the roles are proscribed – the prosecutor wants to convict, the defendant wants a decision of not guilty. They are not just allowed but expected to bias their presentation, trusting the truth to come out between the adversaries. Science certainly has its sides of partisanship and bias. But these sides are self-imposed and can be abandoned at any time. While a prosecutor should not lie or hide evidence, and should drop a case if they become convinced the defendant is innocent, they wake up in the morning with no choice about which side of the argument they will come down on. In the criminal justice system the advocates are rigidly fixed in their roles and the jurors are rigidly neutral (the process to find a random neutral jury took as long as the trial itself). In science, the advocates are the same people as the jurors. And as a result they have to be willing to be flexible and change their minds. A good scientist shouldn’t have a pre-determined rigid answer to a question.
Lack of investigation – we jurors were told over and over not to investigate the situation ourselves. We were to make our decision only on the basis of the evidence presented to us. I can tell you in the case I was on there were at least two whopping big questions hanging over the case that nearly every juror in the room identified as very important but not addressed by either lawyer. Either one of them (whether the defendant’s schedule allowed time to drink before being stopped in the car, whether a particular medical condition could affect breathalyzer tests) could have changed the outcome. We could have answered one of these with 10 minutes on google and the other with some very simple subpoena of records. But we couldn’t use any of this. Scientists obviously are the opposite – if they need more information, they are expected to go get it before making an opinion.
Reliance on personal testimony – although science and trials share a focus on evidence, trials recognize testimony of individual people under oath as a major form of evidence. They certainly acknowledge the possibility of lying and explicitly instruct jurors to decide what testimony they believe. My case was unusual in that there was so much video footage, but still a majority of the case came down to testimony by the police officers, and most cases even a few years ago would have had only testimony. Science on the other hand, doesn’t accept testimony. Or does it? What else is the methods and results section of a paper? I’m on the fence whether science is so different on this one.

3 0

3 years ago