Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Pls add me and give me a Brainllest which is the crown
Secondary sources are not primary, and it is proven that information from one source to another becomes jumbled.
Answer: today´s historiography does not consider Homer a historian (Herodotus is considered a founding father of historiography). Until 19th century history was considered a literary gendre and not a science. It was in the 19th century when historians decided to become scientists. Homer was a poet and did not consider himself an author but only a poet and singer who translates what mother memory (goddess Mnemosyne and her daughters, Muses, ...one of them, Clio, is a muse of history) tells him. Homer lived in oral culture in which memory was extremely important, these proto-historians did imaginative "leap" into deeper levels of unconscious. As Freud and Jung said "there are two royal roads to unconscious ...dream and memory"
Explanation: today´s historiography has a lot of "border-disciplines" like psychohistory (founded by DeMausse) or "memory studies" where subjectivity of historian/author is taken into consideration. Writing history is highly subjective process requiring "imaginative leap". In this respect Homer (who always at the beginning of his epics conjures divinites and muses) is an example ....close connection of history, psychology, unconscious.
Answer:
Lynching
Explanation:
Lynching was a method of upholding justice and the law on the frontier, a practice that was occasionally required. For instance, rustlers who were protected by local attorneys would be taken aback in their camp and hung before their advocates could intervene. It was quite hit-and-miss, and many innocent individuals perished as a result. It was also used in Canada and Ireland to target informers, quislings, and any other English collaborators. America's reconstruction, a time of oppression and injustice against the south's population, followed the Civil War and contributed significantly to the development of the Ku Klux Klan. They directed their animosity towards the liberated slaves since they were unable to vent their fury on the true sources of their difficulties. Many black people were slain, often in extremely cruel ways, for no apparent cause, even if some of the crimes were actually true. Ida Wells, a former slave who led the crusade against it and published newspapers to stir opposition against the practice, despite the fact that the numbers were not significant compared to knife deaths in London today, the Liberals were outraged by the focused direction and lack of any natural justice.
