What you have to do is look at all the measurements (ft) and they are labeled. And some of the sides that aren't labeled have clues of what they could be. So when I added, I got 78 ft for my answer.
Well, considering the amount of gravity placed on a kitten on the 4th of June, the answer would be 42
Answer:
The graph should look almost exactly like this. I used a virtual graphing chart to assist, since it is capable of showing more than paper alone.
The base case of 
is trivially true, since
but I think the case of 
may be a bit more convincing in this role. We have by the inclusion/exclusion principle
with equality if 
.
Now assume the case of 
is true, that
We want to use this to prove the claim for 
, that
The I/EP tells us
and by the same argument as in the case, this leads to
By the induction hypothesis, we have an upper bound for the probability of the union of the 
through 
. The result follows.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Assume as a basis the final mixture is 1000 mL. That means 399 mL of alcohol
Let x = mL of Soln A and y = mL of soln B.
x = 2y.
Now x + y = 1000
and 0.2x + 0.17y = 399
but x = 2y so 0.4y + 0.17y = 399
0.57y = 399.
y = 700 mL (That is your mL of solution B)
