The correct question is
<span>Teresa graphs the following 3 equations: y=2x, y=x2+2, and y=2x2. She says that the graph of y=2x will eventually surpass both of the other graphs. Is Teresa correct? Why or why not?
we have that
y=2x
y=x</span>²+2
y=2x²
using a graph tool
see the attached figure
<span>We can affirm the following
</span>the three graphs present the same domain-----> the interval (-∞,∞)
The range of the graph y=2x is the interval (-∞,∞)
The range of the graphs y=x²+2 and y=2x² is the interval [0,∞)
therefore
<span>Teresa is not correct because the graph of y = 2x will not surpass the other two graphs since in the interval of [0, infinite) the three graphs present the same range</span>
P = 50N + 2500 <== ur equation
for 23 copies...sub in 23 for N
P = 50(23) + 2500
P = 1150 + 2500
P = 3650 <==
10 / (2/5)...when dividing with fractions, flip what u r dividing by, then multiply
10 * 5/2 = 50/2 = 25...so there are 25 of them
Answer:
$2936.79
Explanation:
The Formula for compounding interest:

F = final amount (we need to find this)
I = initial amount (900 + 250 + 300 + 1400 = $2850)
r = interest rate (1% = 0.01)
n = number of times interest applied per time period (360)
t = number of time periods elapsed (36 months = 3 years)

F = 2850(1.030454105)
F = $2936.79