Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
Answer:
Dividing both sides of 5x = 4 by 5 yields x = 4 _. 5 . The value of x can now be ... tuting −1 for a into the equation b = –a + 3 gives b = −(−1) + 3, or b = 4. ... ___. 82 − (2i)2 . Since i2 = −1, this can be simplified to 24 − 6i − 40i − 10. __.
hope this helps also Brainliest please:)
It would take that horse a little over 20 minutes.
Answer: x= 10
Step-by-step explanation:
