<u>Vyogtsky</u> emphasized the point that children construct knowledge through social interaction, whereas <u>Piaget</u> emphasized the point that children use adaptation of schemes to organize knowledge.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Psychology is the logical investigation of the psyche and conduct, as indicated by the American Psychological Association. Brain research is a multifaceted order and incorporates many sub-fields of study such territories as human advancement, sports, well being, clinical, social conduct and subjective procedures.
There have been different studies given by different psychologists about the human behavior and the studies focused on various things. Some psychologists like Vyogtsky gave great importance to the social interaction while some gave it a little less importance.
I would say D. I'm guessing tho
When Jesus reached the famous well at Shechem and asked a Samaritan woman for a drink, she replied full of surprise: "Jews do not associate with Samaritans” (John 4:9). In the ancient world, relations between Jews and Samaritans were indeed strained. Josephus reports a number of unpleasant events: Samaritans harass Jewish pilgrims traveling through Samaria between Galilee and Judea, Samaritans scatter human bones in the Jerusalem sanctuary, and Jews in turn burn down Samaritan villages. The very notion of “the good Samaritan” (Luke 10:25-37) only makes sense in a context in which Samaritans were viewed with suspicion and hostility by Jews in and around Jerusalem.
It is difficult to know when the enmity first arose in history—or for that matter, when Jews and Samaritans started seeing themselves (and each other) as separate communities. For at least some Jews during the Second Temple period, 2Kgs 17:24-41 may have explained Samaritan identity: they were descendants of pagan tribes settled by the Assyrians in the former <span>northern kingdom </span>of Israel, the region where most Samaritans live even today. But texts like this may not actually get us any closer to understanding the Samaritans’ historical origins.
The Samaritans, for their part, did not accept any scriptural texts beyond the Pentateuch. Scholars have known for a long time about an ancient and distinctly Samaritan version of the Pentateuch—which has been an important source for textual criticism of the Bible for centuries. In fact, a major indication for a growing Samaritan self-awareness in antiquity was the insertion of "typically Samaritan" additions into this version of the Pentateuch, such as a Decalogue commandment to build an altar on Mount Gerizim, which Samaritans viewed as the sole “place of blessing” (see also Deut 11:29, Deut 27:12). They fiercely rejected Jerusalem—which is not mentioned by name in the Pentateuch—and all Jerusalem-related traditions and institutions such as kingship and messianic eschatology.
*uncle sam
*home of the brave
*melting pot
*land of the free
*the united states of america
*usa
hope that helps :)
I believe the answer is: character
In leadership, character refers to the The way you act/use your position as a leader. This would include things such as your integrity, the ethical standard that you create for the organization, your self-awareness, your empathy toward other group members, your emotional health, etc.
