Answer:
the answer would be 1/15, or approximately 0.067.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
O y = -3
Step-by-step explanation:
The line is horizontal.
x = -3 and x = 3 are vertical lines, so they are incorrect.
The line passes through (3, -3).
(x , y)
Put y as -3.
y = 3
(-3) = 3
Line y = 3 is incorrect.
(-3) = -3
Line y = -3 is correct.
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
I got 16.8 , but she’ll need roughly 17 gallons of paint :)
how i did it :
1. so you know she’ll need 4/5 per book case, and there are 16 bookcases.
2. So you do 16 x 5, then you get 84
3. and you divide 84 by 5. and you’ll get 16.8, that’s how many gallons of paint she needs
Answer: 700.067 g
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : The pharmacist uses 67mg, 100g and 0.6 kg of drug to compound 3 separate prescription.
We know that 1 gram= 1000 milligram
and 1 kilogram = 1000 grams
Then, By UNITARY METHOD, 
Now, We convert each amount of drug into grams as ,
AND
Now, the total drug used by Pharmacist (in grams) = 
Hence, Pharmacist used 700.067 g of total drug.
