Example 1:
The pros of Orthographic is that they can show hidden details and all of the connecting parts, they can be annotated to display material and finishes. The pros of Isometric projection is that they dont need many views and it gives accuracy, cons are is created a unorginized apperance by the lack of foreshortening, I would choose Isometric projection because it shows the size of the figure.
Example 2:
Orthographic projection is a good option for showing lots of detail and small things. The limitation is that with all of that detail, they can become quite messy and hard to understand to someone new to them. However, that is one of the pros of Isometric projection. It gives easy detail and is just as good as an Orthographic. Personally, I find Isometric projections easier to interpret.
Answer:
that is the solution to the question
9514 1404 393
Answer:
4n
Step-by-step explanation:
We observe that each output is 4 times the corresponding input. Then 4 times n will be ...
Input: n
Output: 4n
By observing the graph we can see that G(x) is obtained by shifting F(x) 2 units to the right.
A horizontal shift is indicated by addition/subtraction to x rather than the function.
A right shift is indicated by subtracting the number from x. So a right shift of F(x) will be indicated by F(x-2)
Thus,
G(x) = F(x-2)
G(x) = (x-2)²
So, the answer to this question is option B
Answer:
15 minutes??
I guess?
Step-by-step explanation:
Im really not sure
There's a pattern!!
You just need to count how many numbers passed by!
Clear?
