Yes, I agree with the researcher's method. All the values of 
in the table correspond to the values of n by using their formula.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:
If we substitute the values of n in the researcher's equation and we get the right values of , we can agree with the researcher's method.
The researcher's formula is 
Here is the wombat population and n is the number of years.
Step 2:
When n = 1, 
when n = 2, 
when n = 3, 
when n = 4, 
when n = 5, 
As all the values correspond to the values on the table, I agree with the researcher's method.
No because 22 squared plus 24 squared does not = 26 squared
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
y=mx+b where m=slope and b=y intercept
m=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
m=(-2-4)/(2+1)
m=-2 so far we have the slope
y=-2x+b, using point (2,-2) we can solve for b, the y intercept
-2=-2(2)+b
-2=-4+b
2=b so we have our line
y=-2x+2, slope is -2 and y intercept is 2
That is so confusing the way theyou word it sometimes is like what the...what?
It would be the top one bro i know
