Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
l -> length
b -> width
h -> height
Find the area of four walls and ceiling. then subtract the area of four windows and a door form that area.
Area of four walls + <u>ceiling</u> = 2( lh + bh) +<u>lb</u>
= 2*(20*5 + 15*5) + 20*15
= 2( 100 + 75) + 300
= 2* 175 + 300
= 350 +300
= 650 sq m
Area of window = 2 *3 = 6 sq.m
Area of four windows = 4*6 = 24 sq.m
Area of door = 2 * 1 = 2 sq.m
Area of four walls excluding 4 windows and door = 650 - 24 - 2 = 624 sq.m
Cost of painting = 624 * 6.50
= $ 4056
Answer:
0.98386991
0.9839
Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:
<em>is your answer.</em>
Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Answer:</u>
2. The correct answer option is 25%.
3. The experimental probability is 3% greater than the theoretical probability.
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
2. We are given that a number cube is rolled 20 times out of which 5 times it lands on the number 2.
We are to find the experimental probability of getting the number 2.
P (2) =
= 25%
3. The theoretical Outcomes are: HH HT TH TT
So theoretical probability of getting HH =
= 25%
Total number of outcomes =
= 100
So experimental probability of getting HH =
= 28%
Therefore, the experimental probability is 3% greater than the theoretical probability.
Answer:
The correct option is;
(3) The sample of track athletes show that there is a correlation between foot size and running speed
Step-by-step explanation:
The statements are analysed as follows;
(1) Smaller foot sizes cause track athletes to run slower.
The above statement is a conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement because there are other factors such as taller athletes run faster than average sized athletes
(2) The sample of track athletes shows a causal relationship between
foot size and running speed.
The above statement is similar to the one above as it is a milder conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement
(3) The sample of track athletes shows a correlation between foot size
and running speed.
The above statement is correct as is directly supported by the data as it is a statement made based directly the data
(4) There is no correlation between foot size and running speed in
track athletes.
The above statement is not supported by the available data.