Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
It is known as <span>Self-feedback
</span><span>Self-feedback refers to a form of affirmiation that we do to ourself in order to obtain a certain psychological condition.
Performers or any type of workers in general often use this in order to stay positive in facing every challenges that exist in our life.</span>
The people of Britain<span> by the city of Oslo</span>
Answer:
H0 : C = C0 , H1 : C > C0
Explanation:
Hypothesis is a mathematical relationship statement, whose statistical significance is tested.
'Does the color blue make people feel calmer'
- Null Hypothesis [H0] : Blue color has no impact on people's calmness. C = C0 {C being the post case calmness, C0 usual average calmness}
- Alternate Hypothesis [H1] : Blue color has increasing impact on people's calmness. C > C0
Hypothesis Testing : The test can be done by t test & p test. If calculated t value > tabulated t value & p value < significance p value, we reject H0 & accept H1. In case of vice versa, we reject H1 & accept H0
