Answer:
to get the probability you add the number of figure all together
divide the number of spheres with the total
ie
2 ÷ 10
you get 1÷ 5
you get the answer as 0.2
To solve this equation from the information given above, I ordered it 5x+12=8x. To solve, I subtracted 5x from each side, canceling the 5x to your left, leaving only the number 12. 8x minus 5x equals 3x. Take 3x and divide on both sides. 3x/3x cancels the 3, leaving 12/3 equals 4. Finally, x equals 4.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
4a. ∠V≅∠Y
4b. TU ≅ WX
5. No; no applicable postulate
6. see below
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>4.</h3>
a. When you use the ASA postulate, you are claiming you have shown two angles and the side between them to be congruent. Here, you're given side TV and angle T are congruent to their counterparts, sides WY and angle W. The angle at the other end of segment TV is angle V. Its counterpart is the other end of segment WY from angle W. In order to use ASA, we must show ...
∠V≅∠Y
__
b. When you use the SAS postulate, you are claiming you have shown two sides and the angle between them are congruent. The angle T is between sides TV and TU. The angle congruent to that, ∠W, is between sides WY and WX. Then the missing congruence that must be shown is ...
TU ≅ WX
__
<h3>5.</h3>
The marked congruences are for two sides and a non-included angle. There is no SSA postulate for proving congruence. (In fact, there are two different possible triangles that have the given dimensions. This can be seen in the fact that the given angle is opposite the shortest of the given sides.)
"No, we cannot prove they are congruent because none of the five postulates or theorems can be used."
__
<h3>6.</h3>
The first statement/reason is always the list of "given" statements.
1. ∠A≅∠D, AC≅DC . . . . given
2. . . . . vertical angles are congruent
3. . . . . ASA postulate
4. . . . . CPCTC
2.5y + 1.1x ∠ 10
2.5y = - 1.1x +10
y = (- 1.1/2.5)x + 4
Draw this function. It's descending (m negative). All values on the left of the lines satisfy this inequality
Answer:
Therefore, the budget is 656.76$.
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that a lab orders a shipment of 100 rats a week for experiments that the lab conducts. Suppose the mean cost of the rats turned out to be $ 12.63 per week. We calculate budget of a lab for the next year's.
We know that 1 year have 52 weeks. We get
52 · 12.63 = 656.76
Therefore, the budget is 656.76$.
