1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katen [24]
3 years ago
15

What is the answer to -4x+2?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
5 0
-2(2x-1)
here you go!! :D
You might be interested in
Tips to understand probability
siniylev [52]
<h3>Answer: SO PROBABILITY IS LIKE YE</h3><h3>LIKE ILL PROBABLE ANSWER THIS RIGHT OR ILL ANSWER IT WRONG</h3>

Step-by-step explanation:

I will maybe PROBABLY andswer this right or ill PROBABLY answer is wrong

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the smallest value of k such that 16k is a perfect cube.​
IrinaK [193]

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

The smallest perfect cube would be 0 since it cannot be negative and zero raised to the third power would still be 0

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Gavin's dog had a litter of puppies. All of the puppies in this litter were either yellow or black. If there was one less black
mezya [45]

Answer:

Total number of puppies in the litter = 11

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the number of yellow puppies in the litter = y

And the number of black puppies in the litter = b

If there was one less black puppy, ratio of yellow to black puppies = \frac{2}{3}

\frac{y}{b-1}=\frac{2}{3}

2(b - 1) = 3y

3y - 2b = -2 -----(1)

If there was one more black puppy, ratio of yellow puppies to black puppies = \frac{1}{2}

\frac{y}{b+1}=\frac{1}{2}

2y = b + 1

2y - b = 1 -------(2)

Equation (1) - 2× equation (2)

(3y - 2b) - 2(2y - b) = -2 - 2

3y - 4y - 2b + 2b = -4

y = 4

From equation (1),

3×4 - 2b = -2

12 - 2b = -2

-2b = -14

b = 7

Total number of puppies in the litter = 7 + 4 = 11

4 0
3 years ago
This is a timed test so I need help fast
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

1st option

Step-by-step explanation:

(x²+x-6)/(x-7)≤0

x≤-3

2≤x≤7

These are the solutions you'll find solving the inequation

Answered by GAUTHMATH

3 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can anyone please help me with just part a? It'd mean a lot.
    10·1 answer
  • A baker used 4 cups of flour to make 5 batches of brownies.How many cups of flour does he need for one batch of brownies
    11·1 answer
  • Howard has a scale model of statue of liberty. The model is 15 inches tall the clay of the model to the actual statue is 1 inch
    12·1 answer
  • 5 times a number increased by 8
    15·2 answers
  • What is the rate of change for the linear relationship modeled in the table? (4 points)
    12·1 answer
  • 100% is shown on the following tape diagram.
    6·1 answer
  • If f(x)=3x^2 and g(x)=4x+2 what is the value of (f+g)(-1)
    10·1 answer
  • What is the coefficient of 5(-t)<br><br> HELPPP
    13·1 answer
  • What is the answer to number 4 ?
    12·2 answers
  • Solve for x. Round to the nearest tenth.​
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!