The overturning of the "Separate but equal doctrine" was considered a major move towards ending the racial caste system in the United States. Thus, Option D is the correct statement.
<h3>Why was the "separate but equal" doctrine rejected?</h3>
The Supreme Court overturned decades of law when it ruled that the country's laws prohibiting equal access to racially-based education violated an equal protection provision of Article 14.
Thus, The overturning of the "Separate but equal doctrine" was considered a major move towards ending the racial caste system in the United States. Option D is the correct statement.
Learn more about "separate but equal" here:
brainly.com/question/16995413
#SPJ1
<span>According to the
Constitution of United States, the delegated powers of a federal government are
superior to the state laws in case when there is a clash between the two i.e.
State and Federal. However the states in their own frame can have the laws
which at no point contradict with the supreme Law of United States.</span>
A normal non frightened Turkey can run at speeds up to 25 mph<span>.
</span>A spooked turkey can run at speeds up to 20 miles per hour<span>. They can also burst into flight approaching speeds be tween 50-55 in a matter of seconds.</span>
Between 1948 and 1952, the United States spent approximately $12.7 billion in a program known as the Marshall Plan. This program provided funding to the war-torn countries of Europe in an effort to eradicate famine and rebuild their infrastructures and economies. A second diplomatic goal of the Marshall Plan was to help stop the spread of Communism into these unstable nations.
so Its <u>A. Marshall Plan</u>
Answer: The right to full disclosure
Explanation:
Right to full disclosure is the regulation in legal terms that makes organization or any person reveal every necessary and important information to other person or party before making them enter into the contract or any type of agreement.
Any major details that should be known to other person cannot be hidden before making people enter the contract otherwise it is falsely making people engage in contract.
According to the question,right to full disclosure right is getting violated as participant do not share actual truth i.e.- cancer diagnosis coping experiment rather study on health belief is informed.
