I believe the answer is the feminist perspective.
The feminist perspective perceive gender as the role that a society expected to be done by a certain biological sex.
In order to tackle this problem, they aimed to prove that the female are just as capable as man in many roles that the society does not expect them to be.
Answer:
A. approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial
Explanation:
Solomon Asch's conducted an experiment to determine how social pressure from a majoritywould affect a person to conform. In psychology, conformity is the likelihood of a person to follow the behavior of the social group an individual belongs to. In each experiment, a naive student was placed in a room with several other confederates who agreed in advance what their responses would be when presented with the line task without the real participant knowing. After line task was presented, the confederates began answering the questions correctly. However eventually began providing incorrect answers based on how they had been instructed by the experimenters. They were 18 trials and the confederates provided 12 wrong answers. The purpose of this experiment was to see if the participant would conform to that of the others in the group.
The result at the end of the experiment showed that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
there are many reasons why they did not want to give up their land. For one, their land was habitable and they had been there for many years so they did not want to leave. Two, they were being forced out of their land whether they agreed to or not. Plus, each Native American tribe had their own land that was theirs and by moving to a new place, they would be forced into someone else's land.
I hope this helps :3
Answer: We learn from people's mistakes and those in the past my inspire us to do great things
Explanation:
Answer: the correct answer is C. No, because the jury could find that the company should have foreseen that children would sneak into the park.
Explanation:
In this case, the company has the obligation to forsee possible threats and has no excuse for not having taken action in doing that.
