Answer:
Your answer is right! It's (-2, 8)
Answer:
- 240
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to find the value of the following determinant

Now, we know that the value of a general determinant
is given by [a( ei - fh) + b(fg - di) + c(dh - eg)]
Therefore, the value of the given determinant is
= 4[0 × 4 - (-1)(-2)] + 8[3(-1) - 4 × 4] + 10[4(-2) - 3 × 0]
= - 8 - 152 - 80 = - 240 (Answer)
Answer:
x=6
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve, we need to get the variable, x, by itself. To do this, first, move all the variables to one side of the equation, and the numbers to the other
2/3(15x-6)=8(x+1)
First, distribute the 2/3 on the left
2/3*15x + 2/3*-6=8(x+1)
10x-4=8(x+1)
Next, distribute the 8 on the right
10x-4=8*x + 8*1
10x-4=8x+8
Subtract 8x from both sides
10x-8x-4=8x-8x+8
2x-4=8
Add 4 to both sides
2x-4+4=8+4
2x=12
Now all the numbers are on one side, and the variables are on the other. x is not by itself though, it is being multiplied by 2. To undo this, divide both sides by 2
2x/2=12/2
x=6
-15=11-2b
-11. -11
-26=-2b
-2. -2
13=b
Answer:
B. There is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the above picture, for the nutritionist to determine whether there is an association between where food is prepared and the number of calories the food contains, there must be an association between two categorical variables.
The conditions that satisfy whether there exists an association between conditional relative frequencies are:
1. When there is a bigger difference in the conditional relative frequencies, the stronger the association between the variables.
2. When the conditional relative frequencies are nearly equal for all categories, there may be no association between the variables.
For the given conditional relative frequency, we can see that there exists a significant difference between the columns of the table in the picture because 0.15 is significantly different from 0.55 and 0.85 is significantly different from 0.45
We can conclude that there is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55