Answer:
A) $279,200
Explanation:
September sale: 302,000, 80% paid on credit which is = 80% x 302,000 = 241,600, of which 50% are collected in the following month (October), which is equal to 241,600 x 50% = $120,800
October sale = 264,000
20% paid on cash, which is = 20% x 264,000 = 52,800
80% paid on credit and 50% of which is collected in the month of sale (October) = 80% x 50% x 264,000 = $105,600
Total cash collections for October = 120,800 + 52,800 + 105,600 = $279,200
Answer:
Profit oriented
Explanation:
Price level is the approach which is referred to as the purchasing power of money. This is analyzed by the basket of goods approach, in which the consumer grounded goods and services are examined in total.
There are 4 usual approaches for finding the approximate price level for the service or product, and that are competition-oriented pricing., cost oriented, demand oriented and profit oriented.
Answer:
She is better off by $40,
Please kindly go through the explanation section for rest of the answers.
Explanation:
From the Question,
Grocery saving = 40%
Laptop saving = 2.5%
Absolute saving in grocery = $4
Absolute saving in Laptop =$10
Yes he should sacrifice 20 mins to save $10 since he does the same for less savings
Second case:
Since Ted is depositing money for only 6 months at 10% interest rate, he is giving up half his annual interest of (0.1*750)/2 = $37.5
Third case:
Interest accrued on student loan = 0.07*2000 = $140
Interest on credit card = $75 + (0.07*1500) = $180
She is better off by $40.
Answer:
Accounting treatment (debit credit rules) of given entries
Explanation:
- Purchased office furniture on account Account
Furniture ie Asset increase - Debit , Creditor (Furniture Supplier) ie Liability increase - Credit
- Provided services on account
Debtor ie Asset increase - Debit , Sale ie Income increase - Credit
Prepaid Expense (Rent) ie Asset Increase - Debit. Rent paid now implies later rent ie (Expense) decrease - Credit
Answer: price leadership
Explanation: Price leadership is a circumstance where one business, typically the dominant one in its market, sets prices that its rivals follow closely.
This business is typically the one with the minimum cost of production, thus being able to outperform the prices charged by any rival who tries to set their prices below the price range of the market leader.
Rivals could increase prices than the cost leader, but this would likely lead to lower share of the market unless rivals were able to distinguish their goods adequately.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the given case depicts price leadership strategy.
