1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11111nata11111 [884]
3 years ago
11

The city of Chicago bans hand-guns. Owners of hand-guns sue the city and win…

Social Studies
1 answer:
Nata [24]3 years ago
5 0

The second amendment gives people the right to own guns. The third amendment basically states that you can’t force people to house soldiers (more relevant in the older times). So, obviously the amendment we are dealing with here is the second amendment. A city or state is not allowed to ban something that is protected by the amendments, and having and owning a hand gun is protected by the second amendment (with a license). Therefore, the city of Chicago violated the second amendment. Your answer would be A.

Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in
The negative effect of group recall on memory is known as collaborative _____, where the same number of individuals working toge
expeople1 [14]
The correct answer is collaborative inhibition.

Collaborative inhibition refers to the phenomenon wherein a group has poor memory recall compared to when individual group members work on their own. Collaborative inhibition is caused because by listening to others' inputs and having discussions, each group member's individual and unique memory retrieval tools are disrupted. 

4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST!!!!!
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

okay but I think the answer is A yeah I think but is it's wrong I am terribly sorry but i its right i am happy for you

8 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP! ASAP! Will Give brainliest!
Ne4ueva [31]

last one people may become reluctant.

Explanation:

Since the intrest is lower, that means you wouldnt have to pay as much, that means people would borrow more not less

6 0
3 years ago
Cellus<br> Who benefits from<br> the trade routes?
arlik [135]

Answer:

cellus

Explanation:

cause he ot she trade frome routes

5 0
4 years ago
Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority was a class action suit that alleged that public housing was, in effect Group of answer c
tester [92]

The class-action suit arises between the Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority alleged that public housing impacted government-sponsored segregation.

Option B is the correct answer.

<h3>What is a class action suit?</h3>

A class-action suit is a lawsuit filed by a particular person on behalf of the group of affected people against the accused party.

According to the provided case, the public housing was claimed by the government segregation which is being disputed in the class action suit. It provides dollars of money to the people of the US to acquire properties in residential areas.

Therefore, Government-sponsored segregation was alleged in the public housing under the class action suit in the provided case.

Learn more about the class action suit in the related link:

brainly.com/question/6330329

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In your lesson today you learned that items can be dissolved faster when
    12·1 answer
  • Quote where antony asks to speak at caesars funeal
    15·1 answer
  • A person's class (socioeconomic status based on a person's education, occupation, and income) is the most significant predictor
    14·1 answer
  • If you went door-to-door with a petition trying to get enough signatures for a proposal to be voted on by citizens, what form of
    10·1 answer
  • One of the goals of the Southern Farmers’ Alliance was to end ___________ systems.
    15·1 answer
  • All of the following peninsulas are circled on the map above except
    5·1 answer
  • __________ is a process by which we learn to associate stimuli and consequently, to aniticipate events?
    15·2 answers
  • What made standard oil a horizontal integration monopoly
    14·1 answer
  • Hey ur name is im guessing
    9·2 answers
  • Any person who opens a piece of evidence may be called upon to testify about that evidence in court.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!