Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Basically you don't need to find x to know the scale factor ,
but I did.So you see that multiple 3 by 2 you will get 6
(MN) and the same will happen with 5.5 and NO (which is 11 btw).
so you can write 2:1
Answer:
Part A: Based on the information collected, who will have the higher mean annual salary?
College graduates have a higher mean by about $20,000
Part B: If you were to graph this data, what would be important to consider?
The data should be graphed on the same axis and scale so comparisons are possible
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the definition of vertical angles, the value of z is: 15.
<h3>Vertical Angles Pair</h3>
The two pairs of opposite angles formed when two straight lines intersect are called vertical angles, and are therefore congruent to each other.
Thus:
2z + 10 = 40
2z = 40 - 10
2z = 30
z = 30/2
z = 15
Therefore, using the definition of vertical angles, the value of z is: 15.
Learn more about vertical angles on:
brainly.com/question/1673457
We compute for the side lengths using the distance formula √[(x₂-x₁)²+(y₂-y₁)²].
AB = √[(-7--5)²+(4-7)²] = √13
A'B' = √[(-9--7)²+(0-3)²] = √13
BC = √[(-5--3)²+(7-4)²] = √13
B'C' = √[(-7--5)²+(3-0)²] =√13
CD = √[(-3--5)²+(4-1)²] = √13
C'D' = √[(-5--7)²+(0--3)²] = √13
DA = √[(-5--7)²+(1-4)²] = √13
D'A' = √[(-7--9)²+(-3-0)²] = √13
The two polygons are squares with the same side lengths.
But this is not enough information to support the argument that the two figures are congruent. In order for the two to be congruent, they must satisfy all conditions:
1. They have the same number of sides.
2. All the corresponding sides have equal length.
3. All the corresponding interior angles have the same measurements.
The third condition was not proven.
