I am guessing the chart is going up, his products will most likely continue rising in popularity until it reached its peak, where it would even out of=r decrease depending on popularity
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You ask to examine the impact of risky behavior on different spheres of well-being(social, emotional, physical, and spiritual)
For that to happen I had to interview a couple of young people to know their answers and could conclude something appropriate to answer the question.
Regarding social behavior, one of the risks is to behave differently from what people expect of you. This means that society has a predetermined expectation of the way you have to behave in public places and what to do in different circumstances, When you behave differently, people criticize you and judge you.
Regarding the emotional and directly related to the physical, the risk is to engage in day-to-day drama in the family environment, at school, or with your friends. Yes, that you are caught in the trap of receiving the effects of other people's drama and that you can not leave soon enough to stay out of the drama.
Finally, the spiritual perspective. The risk is that you get lost in different religious and belief systems that make you doubt what your family and church have taught you since you were a child. Today, you are exposed to too many ideas and belief systems that can alter your own.
Answer:
Gender is a term that refers to social or cultural distinctions associated with being male or female. Norms are rules or expectations that are socially enforced. Gender roles are the prescribed behaviors, attitudes and characteristics associated with one's gender status as a female or a male. I'm unsure on the 5 differences, sorry.
Explanation:
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
Lakes and rivers. Amazon River. Hope this helps :)
