In the presently stated speech, Laura would be arguing from the point of causation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When arguing from the point of causation, the speaker or presenter would base her arguments and claims concerning evidence which proves that certain events almost always bring about the same results, or likewise, certain events would always almost eradicate the effects of the events.
Hence here, Laura is speaking from the point of causation.
A top-down process is happening when you shift your attention to something without moving your eyes.
Top-down theories are driven by hypotheses and emphasize the significance of higher mental processes like expectations, beliefs, values, and social influences.
<h3>What are top-down and bottom-up processing?</h3>
Bottom-up processing starts with the retrieval of sensory data from our surroundings so that perceptions can be built based on the sensory data that is now being input. Top-down processing is the process of interpreting incoming information in light of one's prior experiences, knowledge, and expectations.
Perceptions start with the most general and proceed toward the more detailed top-down processing. Our expectations and prior information have a significant impact on these views. Simply said, your brain uses what it already knows to fill in the gaps and predict what will happen next.
Top-down processing is the process by which we see the world around us and interpret incoming information by using what we already know Gregory, 1970.
Learn more about Shifting your Attention here:
brainly.com/question/28246841
#SPJ4
Metacom was killed and the settlers were helped by other tribes.
Answer:
Explanation:
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.
