Answer:
FIRST: You had tell the person that you were going to start an action against them to be heard in "court". You had to bring witnesses with you so your witnesses could testify that the person was told why you were bringing an action, and that you had given this person a date, time, and location that they had to appear in court to defend themselves.
SECOND: You had to post a written notice near the courthouse that clearly stated the names of both parties, the charges, and the date, time, and location of your first trip to court on this action.
FIRST TIME IN COURT: The first trip gave both parties a chance to speak before a judge. If the judge felt there was enough cause, that judge would assign a trial date. That trial date had to be posted as well.
JURY SELECTION, TRIAL BY JURY: To be on a jury, you had to be a citizen. You had to be over 30 years of age. You had to swear that you would be fair to both sides. You did get paid. Juries were selected from volunteers. The number of jurors could be huge. Some trials had as many as 500 jurors who had volunteered to judge a case. Only the jury could bring in a decision that someone was guilty or innocent. The judge only kept order, but could not decide a trial outcome.
THE TRIAL: Both sides presented their case. Then the jurors voted. Majority ruled.
PUNISHMENT: Punishments varied. If found guilty, both sides, the person bringing the charge and the person being charged, suggested a punishment. The jury could not choose a third choice. They had to choice one suggestion or the other.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Cultural capital.
Explanation:
According to Bordieu, cultural capital refers to the certain <em>knowledge, abilities and skills </em>an individual can make use of in order to prove his/her social status or that he/she is culturally competent.
In this case, students from different backgrounds come with various <em>values, beliefs, attitudes and competencies in language and culture</em> which they can tap into in order to <em>establish their </em><em>social status</em><em> and </em><em>cultural competence. </em>
Explanation:
Dr. Liz, specialist in orthodontics, carried out analysis studies regarding the information registered in the system, by the previous dentist, she could clearly notice that there was not a complete registry regarding the controls performed on the patients, there was an information disorder, and many times the information was not true regarding the patient's history; All this led to an in-depth investigation and it was found that there was definitely no distributional order regarding the patients that correspond to each of the EPS or entities to which the primary Ips provides the service.
However, Dr. Liz found that the problem of the lack of information began from the moment the Doctor made the registration, since on many occasions he did not have the appropriate tools to do it as a good computer since sometimes it had failures and the information was written on forms that many times, due to the number of patients, were recast or lost.
As a first step, it was necessary for the doctors to be made aware of the correct registration and to diligently attend to and detail the records of each patient; In addition also that the equipment and instruments necessary to collect the information were requested urgently, at the beginning, Liz said it was not easy, it was a total rejection, because joint work and collaboration were needed, in addition to the limitation of spaces and resources of the Ips seemed impossible to solve all those problems.
Finally, the medical evidence and the disagreement of the patients, due to the misinformation and lack of records, made it possible for concrete solutions to be given for the common benefit.
Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers
I don’t know if this is right, but I think it is dissipation
