<u>Yes, if he breaks any of the laws of nature, because these are the moral laws for Hobbes.
</u>
Violating the laws of nature can be not performing one's valid pacts as a ruler or not seeking peace when others want to do so and also not being grateful.
Moral limits that Hobbes places on the ruler are useless, because when we make a pact with the ruler, we give all of our natural rights away to the sovereign.
We cannot question/revolt because they've our rights.
Can only act if we are in danger ⇒ right to self - defense
Answer:
Common scams and crimes in Saigon: Bag and phone snatching: Travellers frequently fall victim to bag and phone snatchers on motorbikes when crossing the road. This is the most serious and most common problem to befall travellers
Explanation:
Answer: Repentance
Explanation: Expressed publicly, this act of speech can be seen as an act of weakness or, conversely, as an act of strenght that exalts the image of the issuer, far from reducing it. It would then be a statement that contains three speech acts: the act of recognition of the fault, that of the proposal for reparation and the act of bravery that emerges from the public recongition of the lack of the politician´s regret is considered a discursive strategy of power that allows you to rehabilitate your image. In its strategic elaboration, the politician tries to appear sincere while mitigating or justifying the importance of the fault.
They had trade routes and sold to the people of the lands.
<span>She is engaged in "comprehensive" listening. Simply put, this is the kind of listening that is needed in order to understand the information that is being presented. Therefore, it is "comprehensive" listening, where they're learning to comprehend the information that is being provided.</span>
