Based on the z-statistic of –2.5 for the sample data, should the null hypothesis be rejected? Yes, because the z-statistic lies
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
One possible equation is , which is equivalent to
.
Step-by-step explanation:
The factor theorem states that if (where
is a constant) is a root of a function,
would be a factor of that function.
The question states that and
are
-intercepts of this function. In other words,
and
would both set the value of this quadratic function to
. Thus,
and
would be two roots of this function.
By the factor theorem, and
would be two factors of this function.
Because the function in this question is quadratic, and
would be the only two factors of this function. In other words, for some constant
(
):
.
Simplify to obtain:
.
Expand this expression to obtain:
.
(Quadratic functions are polynomials of degree two. If this function has any factor other than and
, expanding the expression would give a polynomial of degree at least three- not quadratic.)
Every non-zero value of corresponds to a distinct quadratic function with
-intercepts
and
. For example, with
:
, or equivalently,
.
Answer:
The price of a single printer cartridge is 19.69, in your given currency.
Step-by-step explanation:
First remove the tax and the software package from the total bill.
Since there are 3 cartridges, you divide 59.07 by 3, giving you the price of a single cartridge.