Please help asap! i’m confused which proof to use!

Mathematics

2 answers:

sweet-ann [11.9K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

a direct proof

Step-by-step explanation:

notka56 [123]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

direct proof

Step-by-step explanation:

any kind of chart wouldnt be helpful, and an indirect proof wouldnt either.

You might be interested in

A social scientist is interested in determining if there is a significant difference in the proportion of Republicans between tw

AysviL [449]

Answer:

B. The evidence is very strong - there is NO difference in the proportion of Republicans between the two areas of town.

Step-by-step explanation: Generally, a p-value of less than 0.05 is described as a strong evidence in favour of the null hypothesis. A p-value also known as the probability value is also known to provide the smallest level of evidence at which the null hypothesis would be rejected.

In the question, The p-value is 0.105 which is bigger in value than 0.05 which means there is no significant difference between the evidence and the null hypothesis.

3 0

3 years ago

Find the perimeter of this problem

GrogVix [38]

Answer: 119 4/7

Step-by-step explanation:

Add all the sides together.

4 0

3 years ago

What is the graph of the function f(x) = the quantity of x plus 2, all over x minus 3

Andrej [43]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The given function is $f(x)=\frac{x+2}{x-3}$ and we need to graph it.

In order to graph this function, we'll find below things:

Horizontal asymptote:

Since the degree of both numerator and denominator is same. Hence, the horizontal asymptote is the ratio of leading coefficient of numerator to the leading coefficient of denominator.

Horizontal asymptote is y = 1/1 = 1

Vertical asymptote:

Vertical asymptote occurs where the denominator is zero.

$x-3=0\\x=3$