The answer is B. Franchising
Licensing also use a similiar Model. But The Difference is When you do a Franchising , The company that own the trademark will give as support to aid the franchise. They also make sure that each branches do not cannibalized each others' profit.
In a Licensing model, the company who own the trademark won't give you any support whatsoever.
<span>This is an example of "Non-normative life event".
Non-normative life events refers to those events that happen surprisingly, for example, catastrophic events, loss of a relative and war or winning a lottery which is unexpected. Indeed, even in cases that passing or sickness, in particular ages, are factually viewed as regularizing, they are really non-regulating. They are as yet startling and undesired occasions, related with serious impacts. Non-normative events might be included both negative and positive occasions, for example, passing of a darling individual or winning in a lottery. Be that as it may, in the two cases, they are unexpected and slightly related to chronological age.</span>
Answer:
no option is correct
long term capital gains = ($24.50 - $22) x 500 = $1,250
dividend income = $0.32 x 500 = $160
total return = $1,410
Maybe your teacher is asking about long term capital gains only. If that is the case, then option A. $1,250 is correct
Explanation:
total return = ending value - initial value + dividends received = (500 x $24.50) - (500 x $22) + (500 x $0.32) = $12,250 - $11,000 + $160 = $1,410
holding period return = (ending value - initial value + dividends received) / initial value = $1,410 / $11,000 = 0.1282 = 12.82%
Answer: Quality is never costless because monitoring and prevention have costs
Explanation:
The cost of quality has two parts which are the cost of prevention and the cost of failure. The cost of quality simply refers to the sum of the prevention cost and the cost of failure.
It should be noted that spending more on prevention helps in reducing the cost of failure. According to experts, quality is is never costless because monitoring and prevention have costs.
Answer:
the phrases "probationary employee" and "permanent employee"
Explanation:
Based on this information he should suggest that the phrases "probationary employee" and "permanent employee" be edited or removed to avoid implied contracts that might negate the company's employment-at-will rights. This refers to the rights of an employer to be able to terminate the employee at any time that they see fit but only if they have a valid and legal reason. Otherwise they will be legally liable.
