Answer:
b. attempts to provide a product with greater customer value than the first mover.
Explanation:
In marketing, it is believed that the first mover gains an edge over the followers. A first mover is the initial entrant and provider of products and services catering to a marketing segment.
A second mover refers to the immediate next of the first mover. The advantage second mover has over the first mover being, it can analyze the response the first mover generated and effectively gauge what went right and what went wrong for the first mover.
This way, the second mover can provide improved products than the first mover by not committing same errors as the first mover.
Answer:
$89.41
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Dividend declared = $6.30 per share
Tax rate = 20%
Selling price of the stock = $94.45
Now,
Aftertax dividend = Dividend × ( 1 - Tax rate )
= $6.30 × ( 1 - 0.20 )
= $5.04
Thus,
Ex-dividend price = Selling price - Aftertax dividend
or
Ex-dividend price = $94.45 - $5.04
or
Ex-dividend price = $89.41
Answer:
Explanation:
Price is sum of:
1. Present value of expected dividend payments during 1-4 years;
2. Present value of the expected market price at the end of the fourth year based on growth at 5%.
Present value of expected dividend payments during 1-4 years:
PV1 = 3*(1+0.30)*0.8929 = 3.90*0.8929 = $3.482
*0.8929 = 1/1.12
PV2 = 3.90*1.30*0.7972 = 5.07*0.7972 = $4.042
PV3 = 5.07*1.30*0.7118 = 6.591*0.7118 = $4.691
PV4 = 6.591*1.30*0.6355 = 8.5683*0.6355 = $5.445
Total = $17.661
Present value of the expected market price at the end of the fourth year:
Market price of the share at the end = 5th year dividend/(Required rate of return - growth rate)
5th year dividend = $8.5683*(1+growth rate) = $8.5683*(1+0.05) = $9
Market price of the share at the end = $9/(0.12-0.05) = $128.57
Present value of $128.57 is 128.57*0.6355(present value interest factor for year 4) = $81.7
So the price of share is $17.661+$81.7 = $99.37
Answer:
EXPLAINING STRESSFUL EVENTS BY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO A TEMPORARY SITUATION.
Explanation:
Attribution theory deals with how the social perceiver uses information to arrive at causal explanations for events. It examines what information is gathered and how it is combined to form a causal judgment.
Explanatory style is the characteristic, habitual way individuals explain the causes of good and bad events they experience.
Stressful events can either be good or bad. People may attribute stressful events to factors that are either temporary or permanent and specific or universal.
Carmela's thought means she is explaining her stressful work (event) by attributing it to a temporary situation since she thinks she will get the hang of it in a few months.
Therefore, an example of the explanatory style is EXPLAINING STRESSFUL EVENTS BY ATTRIBUTING THEM TO TEMPORARY EVENTS.
Answer:
yes, there is no separation between the administration and ownership in a partnership.
the partnership contract stipulates which partners have the decision making ability and which partners don't. We cannot say specifically that limited partners have no say in decision making.
Moreover, the control of the partnership is not based on the amount invested like in corporations. that too is based on the contract. however, in practice, yes if you have more money invested in the business, you have more influence.
Explanation:
