Answer:
$73,600
Explanation:
Cash flow from Operating Activity
Cash sales $26,000
Collections on accounts receivable $99,000
Payments to suppliers ($47,000)
Cash generated from operations $78,000
Income taxes paid ($4,400)
Net cash provided by operating activities $73,600
therefore,
the amount of net cash provided by operating activities indicated by these transactions is $73,600
Answer:
It will take 464 weeks.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Future value (FV)= $8,400
Present value (PV)= $5,000
Interest rate (i)= 0.058/52= 0.00112
<u>To calculate the number of weeks required to reach the objective, we need to use the following formula:</u>
n= ln(FV/PV) / ln(1+i)
n= ln(8,400/5,000) / ln(1.00112)
n= 463.47 = 646
Answer:
at maturity I will receive 1,155.6
the real return is 7%
the nominal will be 15.56%
Explanation:
As it is indexed it will paid a real rate of 7% adjusted for 8% inflation
1,000 x 1.07 x 1.08 = 1,155.6 received at maturity
no know the nominal rate we do:
nominal = 0.1556 = 15.56%
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
Answer:
Year 1: $2,150,000
Year 2: $2,291,600
Year 3: $2,260,320
Explanation:
Clifton's stock in Year 1 = $(2,400,000 - 250,000) = $2,150,000
To obtain percentage tax = (250,000 X 100%)/ 2,400,000 = 10.4% = 0.104
In year 2: Tax on $400,000 = $400,000 * 0.104 = $41,600
∴ Clifton's Stock in year 2 = $(2,150,000 + 41,600 + 100,000) = $2,291,600
In year 3: Tax on $180,00 = $180,000 * 0.104 = $18,720
∴ Clifton's stock in year 3 = $(2,291,600 + 18,720 + 300,000) = $2,260,320
