Modern psychology turned away from behaviorism in its classic because failed to consider the mental processes underlying cognition, option D as explained below.
<h3>What is behaviorism?</h3>
Behaviorism is a branch of psychology that does not take the subjective into consideration. People are regarded as sets of behaviors, all of which are learned through positive or negative reinforcement (rewards and punishments). Therefore, any other reasons for someone to behave in a certain way are not considered in behaviorism.
That is why modern psychology turned away from classic behaviorism. Since it failed to consider the mental processes underlying cognition, behaviorism isnow regarded as too limited an approach
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that option D is the correct answer for this question.
The complete question with the missing answer choices is the following:
Modern psychology turned away from behaviorism in its classic form for many reasons, including the fact that
- humans are more similar to computers than to other species studied in the laboratory.
- psychology rejected behaviorism's emphasis on an organism's subjective states.
- an organism's behavior can be changed by learning.
- classical behaviorism failed to consider the mental processes underlying cognition.
Learn more about behaviorism here:
brainly.com/question/14272121
#SPJ1
The situation in which dying millionaires are more likely to leave their fortunes to close genetic relatives than distant relatives or strangers best explains the concept of kin selection. According the kin selection a<span> gene causes an individual to behave altruistically towards its relatives. </span>
The answer in both statements are true. It is because an interest party is someone who likely stands to gain as this is a type of individual who awaits to gain something or to acquire something. While the disinterested party is no or little stake because he or she doesn't want to be involved or to gain something.
Only if they are older than 17 years old
