Okay, so we know off the bat that this will be a past-participial phrase. This is because a past-participial phrase deals with an 'ed' at the end, meaning its context is in the past.
But what about the essential part? Well, look at the words used here. Essential means that if you were to remove a word, phrase, or clause, the passage would not make sense.
On the other hand, a non-essential means it would still make sense even removed.
A non-essential past-participial phrase has non-essential information which will usually be set off by a group of commas.
Do <em>you </em>think that the information given separated by commas is essential? Do we need to know it was broke in two places? Do we need to know it healed slowly?
Hopefully, this helps! =)
D: it portrays citizens of the Dominican Republic as in denial of the problems of colorism in their country.
Answer:
The definition of aristocratic is someone or something that is part of or similar to royalty or people who believe they are superior in some way. When someone likes to buy expensive things and enjoy the best of everything it is an example of having aristocratic tastes.
The king and queen summoned them to Elsinore in hope they can cheer Hamlet out of his melancholy
<span>On June 22, 1941, Nazi Germany occupied the U.S.S.R. in a performance of destruction of their non-aggression deal. At the time of this speech (July 3rd), the Germans were proceeding at lightning speed. The main purpose of this broadcast was to comfort the Russian people and motivate them to fight the attacking Germany army. So the answer is A.</span>