BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bolog
y BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY BIOLOGY Biolgy Biology biology bology BiOlOgY
2 answers:
You might be interested in
- By substitution, justify that x = − 6 is a solution to x − 2 = − x − 14.
First, let's substitute the value of x as -6 in the equation.
Now, let's solve it.
Subtract 2 from -6 to get -8.
The opposite of -6 is 6.
Subtract 14 from 6 to get -8.
Compare -8 and -8. We can see that both the LHS & RHS are equal to each other. So, hence we proved that <u>x = − 6 is a solution of x − 2 = − x − 14.</u>