1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Semenov [28]
3 years ago
14

Which table shows exponential decay?

Mathematics
1 answer:
vazorg [7]3 years ago
5 0
I dknt see anything but just numbers no pic so ima guess 8
You might be interested in
The cost of 1 m ribbon is ₹ 75. Find the cost of 7/5 metres of ribbon​
Margaret [11]

Given that

The cost of 1 m ribbon = Rs.75

The cost of 7/5 m ribbon

→ (7/5)×75

→ (7×75)/5

→7×15

→₹ 105

The cost of 7/5 m ribbon is ₹105.

8 0
3 years ago
`ANSWER ASAP GIVING BRAILIEST AND STUFF!
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

If the dimension increased by doubled, tripled or quadrupled, then it will be 2x, 3x, or 4x for each dimension.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the formula for percentages compound interest is P=I/N???
vampirchik [111]

Answer an essay on nothing

Step-by-step explanation:

In philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.

It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.

Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?

Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.

The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.

This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.

Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.

If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?

This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.

Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.

4 0
2 years ago
Write the equation of a line, in general form, that has an slope of zero and a y-intercept of (0,4).
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

y - 4 = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

They give you the y coordinate, 4, and the x coordinate as 0.

Put 4 in as y.

4 - 4 = 0. That means x = 0 and that is right.

To make sure it has a slope of zero, subtract 4 on both sides.

You get : y = 4. This means that the line will be straight and it will have a slope of zero.

7 0
3 years ago
Can anyone tell me correctly​
BaLLatris [955]

\large\underline\red{\sf \implies Solution :- }

1) A figure formed by line segments only is called a <u>polygon</u><u> </u> .

2) Perimeter of a regular polygon is <u>Number </u><u>of </u><u>sides </u><u>×</u><u> </u><u>Measure </u><u>of </u><u>each </u><u>side </u><u>.</u>

3) Perimeter of a irregular polygon is <u>sum </u><u>of </u><u>all </u><u>sides </u><u>.</u>

4) Two circles with same centre but different radii is called <u>Concentric </u><u>circles</u><u>.</u>

5) Ratio of circumference of circle to its diameter is <u>pie </u> and is named by Greek letter <u>π </u>.

6) Distance around the circle is called<u> </u><u>circumference</u><u>.</u>

7) A chord of the circle contains exactly <u>two points</u> on a circle.

8) 1 hectare = <u>1</u><u>0</u><u>,</u><u>0</u><u>0</u><u>0</u><u> </u><u>m²</u>

<h3><u>I </u><u>hope</u><u> </u><u>it </u><u>helped </u><u>ツ</u></h3>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4.16161616 as a mixed number?
    8·1 answer
  • I need help. Please help with 4-5 ;-; big reward
    12·1 answer
  • What's the formula to find the width
    5·2 answers
  • 7. 3x + 4(x – 6) – 3(x – 7) (1 point) 4x – 45 4x – 3 10x – 3 10x + 45
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the follow is the best representation for the cross-section?<br> (a)<br> (b<br> (c)
    12·1 answer
  • Someone Help! PLEASE!
    15·1 answer
  • Consider the equation: X^2+16x-2=11 1) Rewrite the equation by completing the square
    9·2 answers
  • Pls help I’ll mark brainliest
    13·2 answers
  • Triangles ABC and DEF are similar find d
    7·2 answers
  • True or false <br> 2a(3a+4)=6a squared+8a
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!