Part A:
There are 25 blocks for the length, and the length of each is 5.5 inches. 5.5x25=137.5
There are 9 blocks for the height, and each is 2.75 inches. 2.75x9=24.75
Since we're trying to find how much longer the length is to the width, we find the difference. 137.5-24.75=112.75
So part A answer is <em><u>112.75 (or 112¾)</u></em>
Part B:
We know the length is 137.5 and the height is 24.75. To find how many times longer the length is, we need to divide to see how many 24.75 can go into 137.5.
137.5÷24.75=5.55
So the answer to part B is <u><em>5.55. Given the context, the answer would probably be 5, because that's how many entire height can fit.</em></u>
<u><em /></u>
Sorry if it's wrong lol
4 times table: 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40
5 times table: 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50
6 times table: 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60
7 times table: 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70
10 times table: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100
Answer:
Both (B) and (C) are correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Explaining in simple terms, The Simpson's paradox simply describes a phenomenon which occurs when observable trends in a relationship, which are obvious during singular evaluation of the variables disappears when each of this relationships are combined. This is what played out when hitmire appears to d well on both of natyraknamd artificial turf when separately compared, but isn't the same when the turf data was combined. Also, performance may actually not be related to the turf as turf may Just be. a lurking variable causing a spurious association in performance.
