A is most likely right because a lot modern European countries get their borders from cultural and linguistic boundaries after old empires like Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Germany split up. Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Slovenia, just to name a few, were ethnic groups without countries before WW1.
B: isn't true, just look at eastern Europe in the 17th century, tons of ethnic groups living in one country. Even with more immigration to the Europe, most immigrants assimilate into European cultures.
C: Although geography can influence political borders to varying degrees, European nations don't strictly follow physical geographic features to my knowledge. There are a lot of borders based off of rivers you can see have stayed the same despite the rivers moving (Serbia and Croatia's border is a prime example)
D: I don't know what 'define' means in this context, but if it means religion and geography are the main reasons Europe get's their borders is just flat out wrong. We already talked about geography, but religion doesn't effect European borders since most European countries are christians and are secular. The only example I can think off the top of my head of religion affecting borders is in Ireland when they separated the protestant north from the rest of the island which was catholic.
Hope this helped you out :)
Answer:
Steam-powered trains.
Explanation: Railroads provided the most dramatic transportation growth during the 1800s. They facilitated the movement of people, goods, and information, decreased shipping costs and time, and strengthened the links between the Old Northwest and the East.
Answer:
I'm sorry-that must be really hard. If you need anyone to talk to I'm never really doing anything. Just know that you deserve better than anyone that decides to leave. Especially people that are supposed to be there for you.
<span>Efficient agricultural practices made the workforce available for other endeavors. </span>
Answer:
Following are the answer to this question:
Explanation:
I will completely change the voting system with no doubt because there is no doubt in eliminates it. I'm 18, and in my short life, I have also seen a three basic right in elections, in which the national election was managed to win by the selected candidate.
- The peoples voting by their will in the elections, in which the common election was lost and a presidential candidate was appointed. This same electoral college can, by its free will, oppose the person's, in which people will appoint a nonethical president, especially unethical in a country that values the freedom to vote and to change so enormously.
- If the United States does not have the right to vote, it's also essentially free to take a voting booth and voice an opinion that perhaps the voting in the voting of the participating universities is might or may not differ.
