It's probably because there is no gravity which ballpoint pens need for inkflow to the tip.
Answer:
See the answers below.
Explanation:
In order to solve this problem we must use the principle of energy conservation. Which tells us that the energy of a body will always be the same regardless of where it is located. For this case we have two points, point A and point B. Point A is located at the top at 120 [m] and point B is in the middle of the cliff at 60 [m].

The important thing about this problem is to identify the types of energy at each point. Let's take the reference level of potential energy at a height of zero meters. That is, at this point the potential energy is zero.
So at point A we have potential energy and since a velocity of 18 [m/s] is printed, we additionally have kinetic energy.

At Point B the rock is still moving downward, therefore we have kinetic energy and since it is 60 [m] with respect to the reference level we have potential energy.

Therefore we will have the following equation:
![(6.5*9.81*120)+(0.5*6.5*18^{2} )=(6.5*9.81*60)+(0.5*6.5*v_{B}^{2} )\\3.25*v_{B}^{2} =4878.9\\v_{B}=\sqrt{1501.2}\\v_{B}=38.75[m/s]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%286.5%2A9.81%2A120%29%2B%280.5%2A6.5%2A18%5E%7B2%7D%20%29%3D%286.5%2A9.81%2A60%29%2B%280.5%2A6.5%2Av_%7BB%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%29%5C%5C3.25%2Av_%7BB%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D4878.9%5C%5Cv_%7BB%7D%3D%5Csqrt%7B1501.2%7D%5C%5Cv_%7BB%7D%3D38.75%5Bm%2Fs%5D)
The kinetic energy can be easily calculated by means of the kinetic energy equation.
![KE_{B}=\frac{1}{2} *m*v_{B}^{2}\\KE_{B}=0.5*6.5*(38.75)^{2}\\KE_{B}=4878.9[J]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=KE_%7BB%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%2Am%2Av_%7BB%7D%5E%7B2%7D%5C%5CKE_%7BB%7D%3D0.5%2A6.5%2A%2838.75%29%5E%7B2%7D%5C%5CKE_%7BB%7D%3D4878.9%5BJ%5D)
In order to calculate the velocity at the bottom of the cliff where the reference level of potential energy (potential energy equal to zero) is located, we must pose the same equation, with the exception that at the new point there is only kinetic energy.
![E_{A}=E_{C}\\6.5*9.81*120+(0.5*9.81*18^{2} )=0.5*6.5*v_{C}^{2} \\v_{c}^{2} =\sqrt{2843.39}\\v_{c}=53.32[m/s]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=E_%7BA%7D%3DE_%7BC%7D%5C%5C6.5%2A9.81%2A120%2B%280.5%2A9.81%2A18%5E%7B2%7D%20%29%3D0.5%2A6.5%2Av_%7BC%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%5C%5Cv_%7Bc%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%5Csqrt%7B2843.39%7D%5C%5Cv_%7Bc%7D%3D53.32%5Bm%2Fs%5D)
The formula for both is v(t) = v0 + a*t
b) v(8) = 0 + 6m/s^2 *8s = 48 m/s
now we know the beginning (2) and end speed (14), but not the time:
c) 14 = 2 + 1.5*t => t = (14-2)/1.5 = 8 seconds
30 + 6 = 36
36/12 = 3
So, it would take it 3 hours to go 12 kms downstream.
Note that we added 30 and 6 because it was going downstream. If it was going upstream, then we would have had to subtract.
Answer:
In general, the annual sea surface temperatures(SSTs) in the Bay of Bengal(BOB) are higher than the Arabian sea(AS). because, there are two main reasons for higher SST in the Bay of Bengal than the Arabian Sea. they are 1. stratification, 2.strong mixing
stratification is nothing but a phenomenon which stratifies(layers) the sea water when different density water(fresh water, rain water) add into the sea water. So the stratification in the bay of Bengal is comparatively high than the Arabian sea due to the high river discharge and precipitation in the BOB than the AS. the mixing process over the Arabian sea is higher than the Bay of Bengal due to the prevailing of strong winds over the AS (because of the presence of the mountains of east Africa) than Bay of Bengal (because of the winds over the BOB are sluggish in nature then the AS). But generally winds over the sea mixes easily the normal sea water than stratified/stabilized sea water column. That's why less mixing will takes place over the surface of BOB than the AS. So due to the presence of less mixing over the surface of the Bay of Bengal than the Arabian sea, the SST values over the Arabian sea are always lower than the Bay of Bengal. that's why the Arabian sea is colder than the Bay of Bengal.
Explanation: