Answer:
you can try looking at the comandemnts
Explanation:
They thought they could benefit from the area's warn climate and fertile soil.
Answer:
<h2>Democracy </h2>
<h3>A democracy means rule by the people. The name is used for different forms of government, where the people can take part in the decisions that affect the way their community is run. The people elect their leaders. These leaders take this decision about laws. This is commonly called representative democracy. A democracy is the government elected by the people, from among the people themselves. The Army is integral in protecting the country, but it is not elected by the people; hence, it cannot form a democratic government. A democracy is a form of government that empowers the people to exercise political control, limits the power of the head of state, provides for the separation of powers between governmental entities, and ensures the protection of natural rights and civil liberties. In practice, democracy takes many different forms.</h3>
<h2>EXAMPLES:</h2>
<h3>1. If you are opposed to democracy, you do not believe every individual has a voice.</h3>
<h3>2.We use democracy as a method of selecting representatives.</h3>
<h3>3.In point of fact, bourgeois democracy is the political formula for free trade, nothing more.</h3>
<h3>4.The widespread belief in the robustness of the rule of law in Britain certainly reflects our</h3><h3> reputation as a vibrant multicultural democracy.</h3>
<h3>5.A nobility of this kind often gave way to a democracy which either proved as turbulent as itself, or else grew into an oligarchy ruling under democratic forms. Thus at Florence the old nobles became the opposite to a privileged class.</h3>
<h2>please give me brainliest. thank you</h2>
Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
Answer:
<u>A branch of philosophy dealing with values pertaining to human conduct</u>, considering the rightness and wrongness of actions and the goodness or badness of the motives and ends of such actions.
Explanation:
