All categories

2 years ago

Determine the number of real solutions of -2x^2+ 5x – 3 = 0. 2 1 (double root) 5 0

Mathematics

1 answer:

Svetllana [295]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

${ \tt{ - 2 {x}^{2} + 5x - 3 = 0 }} \\ { \tt{2 {x}^{2} - 5x + 3 = 0}} \\ { \tt{(2x - 3)(x - 1) = 0}} \\ { \tt{x = \frac{3}{2} \: and \: 1}}$

You might be interested in

Oblicz.Pamiętaj o kolejności wykonywania działań

SashulF [63]

Answer:

33.275

Step-by-step explanation:

1 step: Difference in brackets

$3.5-2\dfrac{1}{3}=3\dfrac{1}{2}-2\dfrac{1}{3}=(3-2)+\left(\dfrac{1}{2}-\dfrac{1}{3}\right)=1+\dfrac{3-2}{3\cdot 2}=1+\dfrac{1}{6}=1\dfrac{1}{6}$

2 step: $0.75\div\dfrac{1}{3}$

$0.75\div\dfrac{1}{3}=\dfrac{75}{100}\div \dfrac{1}{3}=\dfrac{3}{4}\times \dfrac{3}{1}=\dfrac{9}{4}$

3 step: $1.28\div 0.04$

$1.28\div 0.04=128\div 4=32 \ \text{Move point two decimal places}$

4 step:

$2\dfrac{1}{4}\times 1\dfrac{1}{6}=\dfrac{2\cdot 4+1}{4}\times \dfrac{1\cdot 6+1}{6}=\dfrac{9}{4}\times \dfrac{7}{6}=\dfrac{63}{24}=\dfrac{21}{8}$

5 step:

$\dfrac{9}{4}+32-\dfrac{21}{8}+1.65=(32+1.65)+\left(\dfrac{9}{4}-\dfrac{21}{8}\right)=33.65+\dfrac{9\cdot 2-21}{8}=33.65-\dfrac{3}{8}=33.65-0.375=33.275$

6 0

2 years ago

Is -16/-2 rational or irrational?

mel-nik [20]

Answer:

Totally Rational

Step-by-step explanation:

-16/-2 would give you 8 which is a rational number

I hope this helps, dont hesitate to ask for any question.Mark me as brainliest is appreciated.Tq!!

4 0

2 years ago

What is the remainder if f(x) = x4 – 5x2 - 6x - 10 is divided by x - 3?

bezimeni [28]

Answer:-46

Step-by-step explanation: just took test

5 0

2 years ago

The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data

Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

$m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}$

Where:

$S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}$

$S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}$

$\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}$

$\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}$

And we can find the intercept using this:

$b=\bar y -m \bar x$

And the model obtained for this case is:

$y = -3.4 +5.2 x$

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0

2 years ago

find the length of the segment connecting the two given points. Write your answer in simplest form . ** Round your answer to the

taurus [48]

Answer: 16

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the Y is 0 for both, you can simply draw a line graph with one point at 15, and the other at -1. The difference between 15 and -1 is 16. Or ABS(15-(-1))=16

8 0

2 years ago