Answer:
Option C:- that is equal to mass of an proton.
Explanation:
Protons and neutrons have approximately the same mass, about 1.67 × 10-24 grams, which scientists define as one atomic mass unit (amu) or one Dalton. While electron has mass of 9.31 ×10⁻¹⁹.
Answer:
The equilibrium concentration of NO is 0.001335 M
Explanation:
Step 1: Data given
The equilibrium constant Kc is 0.0025 at 2127 °C
An equilibrium mixture contains 0.023M N2 and 0.031 M O2,
Step 2: The balanced equation
N2(g) + O2(g) ↔ 2NO(g)
Step 3: Concentration at the equilibrium
[N2] = 0.023 M
[O2] = 0.031 M
Kc = 0.0025 = [NO]² / [N2][O2]
Kc = 0.0025 = [NO]² / (0.023)(0.031)
[NO] = 0.001335 M
The equilibrium concentration of NO is 0.001335 M
Answer:K2X
Explanation: Valency can be defined as the combining power of an element. It is the valency that dictates the value an element will have when writing a chemical formula for its compound.
MgX is a compound of magnesium and an element X. The valency of magnesium in most of its compound is +2. Now for the 2 to have been absent in the chemical formula, this shows that the element X itself have a valency if -2 for the valencies of both to have canceled out.
Now considering the element potassium, it is an alkaline metal belonging to group 1 of the periodic table. Hence, it is expected that it has a valency of +1
Forming a compound with element X means there would be an exchange of valencies between the two. We have established that x has a valency of -2. The formula of the compound thus formed by exchanging the valencies of both element would be K2X
I believes you would use grams to describe the mass of a tablespoon an you should report that guy
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Recall that Δ<em>H</em> is the sum of the heats of formation of the products minus the heat of formation of the reactants multiplied by their respective coefficients. That is:

Therefore, from the chemical equation, we have that:
![\displaystyle \begin{aligned} (-317\text{ kJ/mol}) = \left[\Delta H^\circ_f \text{ N$_2$H$_4$} + \Delta H^\circ_f \text{ H$_2$O} \right] -\left[3 \Delta H^\circ_f \text{ H$_2$}+\Delta H^\circ_f \text{ N$_2$O}\right] \end{aligned}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%20%28-317%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%29%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20N%24_2%24H%24_4%24%7D%20%2B%20%20%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20H%24_2%24O%7D%20%20%5Cright%5D%20%20%20-%5Cleft%5B3%20%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20H%24_2%24%7D%2B%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20N%24_2%24O%7D%5Cright%5D%20%5Cend%7Baligned%7D)
Remember that the heat of formation of pure elements (e.g. H₂) are zero. Substitute in known values and solve for hydrazine:
![\displaystyle \begin{aligned} (-317\text{ kJ/mol}) & = \left[ \Delta H^\circ _f \text{ N$_2$H$_4$} + (-285.8\text{ kJ/mol})\right] -\left[ 3(0) + (82.1\text{ kJ/mol})\right] \\ \\ \Delta H^\circ _f \text{ N$_2$H$_4$} & = (-317 + 285.8 + 82.1)\text{ kJ/mol} \\ \\ & = 50.9\text{ kJ/mol} \end{aligned}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%20%28-317%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%29%20%26%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%20%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc%20_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20N%24_2%24H%24_4%24%7D%20%2B%20%28-285.8%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%29%5Cright%5D%20-%5Cleft%5B%203%280%29%20%2B%20%2882.1%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%29%5Cright%5D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc%20_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20N%24_2%24H%24_4%24%7D%20%26%20%3D%20%28-317%20%2B%20285.8%20%2B%2082.1%29%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%26%20%3D%2050.9%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%20%5Cend%7Baligned%7D)
In conclusion, our answer is A.