If you are 1 m above the surface of the earth, and then you jump to 2 m above the surface of the earth.

USPshnik [31]

m =dm ______ 10.000

Meters

The metre is a unit of length in the metric system, and is the base unit of length in the International System of Units (SI).

As the base unit of length in the SI and other m.k.s. systems (based around metres, kilograms and seconds) the metres is used to help derive other units of measurement such as the newton, for force.

8 0

3 years ago

Honeybees can see light in the ________ range of the electromagnetic spectrum. question 8 options:

ELEN [110]

<span>ultraviolet

Have a great day!</span>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What would be the coefficient of performance if the refrigerator (operating between the same temperatures) was instead used as a

viktelen [127]

Complete Question

A certain refrigerator, operating between temperatures of -8.00°C and +23.2°C, can be approximated as a Carnot refrigerator.

What is the refrigerator's coefficient of performance? COP

(b) What If? What would be the coefficient of performance if the refrigerator (operating between the same temperatures) was instead used as a heat pump? COP

Answer:

a

$COP = 8.49$

b

$COP_1 = 9.49$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

The lower operation temperature of refrigerator is $T_1 = -8.00^oC = 265 \ K$

The upper operation temperature of the refrigerator is $T_2 = 23.2 ^oC = 296.2 \ K$

Generally the refrigerators coefficient of performance is mathematically represented as

$COP = \frac{T_1}{T_2 - T_1 }$

=> $COP = \frac{265}{296.2 - 265 }$

=> $COP = 8.49$

Generally if a refrigerator (operating between the same temperatures) was instead used as a heat pump , the coefficient of performance is mathematically represented as

$COP_1 = \frac{T_2}{ T_2 - T_1}$

=> $COP_1 = \frac{296.2}{ 296.2 - 265 }$

=> $COP_1 = 9.49$

8 0

3 years ago

A race car traveling at 44m/s slows at a constant rate to a velocity of 22m/s over 11 seconds , how far does it move during this

krok68 [10]

Answer:

add 44m/s and 22m/s then multiply it by 11

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Why can we never prove that a hypothesis is true?

erma4kov [3.2K]

A theorem can be proven (from axioms or prior theorems), using logic.

A hypothesis can be supported by evidence. The more evidence in support of the hypothesis, the more likely the hypothesis is to be correct. However, you’re always at the mercy of contrary evidence appearing in the future, to reduce the likelihood or even invalidate a hypothesis.

A (mathematical) proof suffers no such vulnerability to future evidence, as long as you hold the axioms of the theory to be true, and as long as there was no flaw in the construction of the proof.

7 0

3 years ago