This question is confusing
The best choice for that example would be that yelling "Fire" in a crowded theater would be restricted. The supreme court has ruled that in a situation like that, where it could cause panic and/or loss of life because of it, that type of speech would not be protected under the first amendment.
Answer:
There might as well be! There are so many stories about aliens and U.F.O's people from NASA are trying to find answers. "The ultimate goal of NASA's exoplanet program is to find unmistakable signs of current life on a planet beyond Earth. How soon that can happen depends on two unknowns: the prevalence of life in the galaxy and how lucky we get as we take those first, tentative, exploratory steps."
Explanation:
hope this helps you!
That statement is true
If fishing related activities are left unregulated by the government, fishers could utilize dangerous method such as using bombs that might destroy the ecosystem in the fresh water. This could make the fish population in a certain area become extinct.
Regulating fishing in freshwater would prevent such things from happening. This create positive economic impact by ensuring that the source of income would not be eliminated from the destruction of environment.
1. No confidentiality. This is the deadliest downfall of crowdsourcing. ... Putting your naming challenge out for crowdsourcing can clue in competitors to what you're up to and make it possible for someone else to see your great new idea and run away with it.
