Please create an argument about a National Landmark/Monument. Do you think there is a monument/landmark out there that should no
t be a National Monument? Should we make a new National monument or landmark? Why or why not? Give 3 good reasons to back up your claim, and each reason paragraph should be supported with pieces of research, and your own words.
You will need
(Introductory Paragraph) I think _____ because (reason 1, 2, 3).
(Reason 1 Paragraph) First, (give first reason). My evidence is...
(Reason 2 Paragraph) Second, (give second reason). My evidence is...
(Reason 3 Paragraph) Third, (give third reason). My evidence is...
(Conclusion Paragraph) In conclusion, (reason 1, 2, 3) supporting the idea that ____.
The tallest national monument in America, it is a legendary engineering triumph, designed by Finnish-born architect Eero Saarinen. As part of the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial, the Gateway Arch serves to commemorate the accomplishments of 19th-century westward pioneers and celebrate the city’s role as the ‘Gateway to the West.’
They're already matched... at least they way you typed it.
Step-by-step explanation:
A ratio is a comparison of two numbers as a fraction or quotient. A part-whole ratio is a ratio comparing a part of something to the whole thing. A part-part ratio is ratio comparing two different parts of one whole.
